In red is represented OG1RF grown in air incubated with a pre-immune serum and detected with Phycoerythrin as negative control. B. Flow cytometry analysis was done in the same conditions as above with samples collected at “”T6″” which corresponds to early stationary growth phase. C. An equal amount (by BCA protein assay) of mutanolysin extract preparation

was 2-fold serial diluted and spotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane. Pilus presence was detected with an anti-EbpC rabbit polyclonal immune serum. The Fsr system effect on the ebp locus We previously presented data in our microarray study suggesting that Fsr repressed the ebpR-ebpABC locus. However, the Fsr effect was only seen at one time point (during late log growth phase) using BHI grown cells [8]; in this medium, fsrB expression increased from mid-log to entry into stationary phase and then decreased rapidly selleck compound [6]. Since our current study Selleckchem GDC-0449 used mainly TSBG (our biofilm medium) as growth medium, we investigated the fsrB expression profile

in TSBG. fsrB expression also increased until entry into stationary growth phase, reaching 66% of the expression detected in BHI broth, but then remained relatively constant throughout stationary phase (Fig. 4). These results indicate that fsr expression is variable in different conditions. Figure 4 fsrB expression profile in OG1RF. For β-gal assays, samples were collected every hour from 3 to 8 hr, then at 10 and 24 hr after starting the culture (x axis). All sets of cultures presented were analyzed concurrently. The figure is a Selleck PCI32765 representative of at least two experiments. The growth curves are

represented in brown for cells grown in BHI-air and purple for cells grown in TSBG (thin line when grown in air, dense line when grown in the GNE-0877 presence of 5% CO2/0.1 M NaHCO3). OG1RF containing P fsrB ::lacZ was grown in BHI air (brown closed diamond), in TSBG- air (purple closed diamond) or in TSBG-5% CO2/0.1 M NaHCO3 (purple open diamond). A. OD600 nm readings. B. β-gal assays (β-gal units = OD420 nm/protein concentration in mg/ml). We next tested ebpR and ebpA expression using the P ebpR :: and P ebpA ::lacZ fusions in OG1RF and TX5266 (ΔfsrB mutant), grown in parallel in TSBG aerobically. Both ebpR and ebpA gene expression profiles followed the same pattern in TX5266 as they did in OG1RF with an increase in expression until the culture reached stationary phase followed by a slow decrease (Fig. 5A). However, ebpR expression was 2-fold lower in OG1RF with 0.3 β-gal units compared to 0.8 β-gal units in TX5266 at entry into stationary phase. Similarly, ebpA expression was 4-fold lower in OG1RF with 3.7 β-gal units compared to 14.1 β-gal units in TX5266 early in stationary phase. These results confirm the role of the Fsr system as a repressor of the ebpR-ebpABC locus in TSBG, adding to the results obtained by microarray at one specific growth phase using cells grown in BHI. Figure 5 ebpR and ebpA expression profiles in TX5266 (Δ fsrB mutant).