10 or close values); (ii) Analysis of Variance (ANOVA); and (iii) Response Surface Methodology. Breads produced can be seen in Fig. 1. Bread specific volume was determined after cooling, on the same day as processing. The values for specific volume of the breads
produced according to the experimental design varied from 5.65 to 6.53 mL/g, with 5.80 mL/g for the Control. It was verified that the Control bread presented specific volume within the range found for the breads of the experimental design. Actually, only Assay 5, without the addition of SSL, presented lower specific volume (5.65 mL/g) than the Control. The importance of this emulsifier can be observed in the Response Surface (Fig. 2), generated by the mathematical model (Table 2) obtained from the experimental data. A greater effect of the emulsifier can be observed in relation to Epigenetics Compound Library cell assay the enzyme, nevertheless it can be noted that both SSL and MALTO had a positive effect on specific volume. The effect of SSL is probably due to its action as a dough strengthener. Dough strengthener emulsifiers are capable of forming liquid films of lamellar structure at the interface between gluten and starch. They improve the ability of gluten to form a film that retains the gas
produced by the yeast (Krog, 1981), that consequently proportioned an increase in volume. The effect of MALTO is due to the presence of fungal α-amylase in its composition, which supplies fermentable sugars for yeast growth
and gas production selleck products mainly before the baking stage (Wong & Robertson, 2002). Also, DAPT amylase functionality in the increase of specific volume may also be related to the reduction of dough viscosity during starch gelatinization, thus prolonging oven rise (Goesaert, Slade, Levin, & Delcour, 2009). However, it was observed that Assay 5, with the presence of 0.20 g MALTO/100 g flour and possibly an additional supply of fermentable sugars for gas production, did not present an increase in bread specific volume when compared to the Control, possibly due to the small amounts used. It can also be observed, through Fig. 2, that varying the quantities of MALTO up to approximately 0.025 g/100 g flour has practically no effect on volume. This is also true for SSL, where the effect of the emulsifier is only observed at concentrations above 0.25 g/100 g flour. That is, there is a minimum amount of this additive (SSL) or processing aid (MALTO) that must be added to have an effect on specific volume. This might be because these compounds are not pure, but diluted with starch or other ingredients. Another important observation is that, using higher quantities of SSL, close to 0.50 g/100 g flour, the quantity of MALTO (maltogenic amylase) had little effect on specific volume.