Overall, the distribution of items into the subscales was confirmed. Some items have high scores on a subscale with which their own subscale is highly correlated. We regard these correlations as acceptable, as long as the score on its own subscale is higher or close. The results of the PLX4032 chemical structure Oblique Multiple Group Method led to combining of two subscales, “withdrawing from responsibilities” and “avoiding contact with colleagues”, into a new subscale named “avoidance behavior”. Also, a total of four items were replaced and five were removed. In the supplemented files, we present the rotated

PKA activator component matrix with the factor loadings for each cluster. At the end of this study, a questionnaire with seven subscales and a total of 50 items was derived (Table 4). The internal consistency is good in four subscales (0.81–0.94) and acceptable in three subscales (0.70–0.78). Table 4 Psychometric properties

of the definite seven subscales Subscale # of items N* Cronbach’s α Theoretical range of sum score Range of sum score in sample (median) Cognitive aspects of task execution and general incidents 11 308 0.94 0–100 0–82 (5) Impaired decision making 3 310 0.88 0–100 0–100 (0) Causing incidents at work** 8 176 0.78 0–100 0–40 (4) Avoidance behavior 8 294 0.70 0–100 0–81 (0) Conflicts and irritations with colleagues 7 311 0.77 0–100 0–61 (4) Impaired contact with patients and their family 8 223 0.81 0–100 0–42 (4) Lack of energy and motivation 5 307 0.81 0–100 0–73 (7) * Number of respondents who answered all items, this N is used for Cronbach’s α 4-Aminobutyrate aminotransferase and the range of the sum score in the sample ** Data selleck chemical of nurses only is analyzed The first subscale was “cognitive aspects of task execution and general incidents”, covering eleven items on working efficiently, alertly, accurately, independently, keeping track of the tasks, and causing incidents in general. The second subscale is “impaired decision making”. This subscale encompasses three items regarding the ability to make important

and quick decisions in stressful situations. The third subscale was “causing incidents at work”, consisting of the eight items covering different types of incidents: medication administration, documentation, and interpretation. This scale was not suitable for the allied health professionals, as too many of them answered “not applicable to my job” on more specific incidents items. The fourth subscale was “avoidance behavior”, which encompassed eight items about avoiding particular tasks and responsibilities as well as avoiding contact and cooperation with co-workers. The fifth subscale was “conflicts and irritations with colleagues”, its seven items described feelings of anger and irritation regarding co-workers and conflicts and tensions in the team. The sixth subscale was “impaired contact with patients and their family”, that included eight items about lack of time, patience, and empathy for patients and their family.