To further verify the microarray data, we have used qRT-PCR to test expression of 17 genes with decreased expression

in one or both mutants (putative sporulation-induced genes). This overall expression pattern was confirmed for several genes, with eleven out of the 17 tested genes showing a significantly lower expression in the whiA mutant compared to the wildtype at at least one of the two sporulation time points 36 h and 48 h (Additional file 2: Figure S2). Thus, a large fraction of this group are developmentally regulated genes correctly identified by the array analysis. Further investigations of several of these genes are described in the Eltanexor ic50 following sections. For the genes that appeared overexpressed in the whiH mutant, i.e. that were putative candidates for being repressed by WhiH, six genes were tested by qRT-PCR. Five find more appeared to be false positives and only one had its microarray expression profile confirmed by qRT-PCR experiments (Additional file 2: Figure S3). This is the previously described gene eshB (SCO5249) encoding a putative cyclic nucleotide-binding protein [29]. The qRT-PCR indicated higher eshB expression during development of the whiH mutant compared to the parent

strain. In an S1 nuclease protection assay (Additional file 2: Figure S4), the eshB promoter was found to be similarly up-regulated during development in both the parent and the whiH mutant, and the level of transcript was only 1.4-fold higher in the mutant at the 36 h time point and not different from wildtype at 48 h (after normalisation to the hrdB promoter as internal control). Also the eshB see more paralogoue eshA (SCO7699) [29] was significantly up-regulated Axenfeld syndrome in the whiH mutant according to the arrays (Additional file 2: Figure S3), but S1 nuclease protection assays showed that eshA is strongly up-regulated during developmental in both strains, with only subtle difference in mRNA level between the whiH mutant and the wild-type (Additional file 2: Figure S4). Overall, our analyses did not reveal any clear candidates for repression by the WhiH transcription factor. Analysis of expression

and mutant phenotypes of new sporulation genes We have specifically investigated seven potential sporulation loci emerging from the microarray analysis (Figure  4). Expression of these loci has been monitored using qRT-PCR (Figure  5), S1 nuclease mapping (Figure  6), and promoter fusions to a reporter gene encoding the fluorescent protein mCherry (Figure  7 and Table  1). For the latter experiments, we constructed a new vector, pKF210, used this to construct “promoter probe” fusions, and introduced them into Streptomyces strains (described in Materials and Methods). Furthermore, deletion mutants have been constructed for these seven loci and examined to detect phenotypes associated with sporulation and maturation of spores.